Tag: sophisticated theology

  • Do You Even Science, Frater?

    The other day, I went to a Thomistic Society talk about Aquinas’s views on the Problem of Evil and other topics. At one point, the presenter casually mentioned that humans engage in self-destructive behavior, like alcoholism, self-mutilation, drug addiction, etc., while non-human animals don’t. That made my [citation needed] sense tingle, so I looked around. Among other […]

  • The Last Superstition: Back to the Cave

    The Last Superstition: Back to the Cave

    Chapter 5: Back to Plato’s cave This last section of Chapter 5 is basically a long jeremiad against everything and everyone Feser doesn’t like, with paranoid rants about the motivations of those who prefer post-Thomistic philosophies: More precisely, their desire to re-orient human life toward this world and reduce the influence of religion led the […]

  • The Last Superstition: Material Brains, Immaterial Software

    The Last Superstition: Material Brains, Immaterial Software

    Chapter 5: The Mind-Body Problem After spending several pages, as is his wont, trashing Locke, Descartes, and other people he doesn’t agree with, Feser tells us why materialist explanations of the mind are doomed: the human mind is all about final causes: we plan, we imagine, we make mental images and so on. All of […]

  • The Last Superstition: Hedonism Killed Aquinas

    The Last Superstition: Hedonism Killed Aquinas

    Chapter 5: Descent of the Modernists This chapter deals with modern philosophers, i.e., René Descartes and later. The first part of it is pretty much philosophical inside baseball, of little interest to those who care less about how ideas have been developed than about which conclusions were eventually reached. I’ll only point out one passage […]

  • The Last Superstition: The Problem of Evil

    The Last Superstition: The Problem of Evil

    4: The problem of evil This section deals with the problem of evil, a problem so big that, just as chemistry is divided into carbon (organic chemistry) and everything else, so I’m told theology is divided into the problem of evil (theodicy) and everything else. But first, Feser has to digress to lay some ground […]

  • The Last Superstition: Software Is Immaterial

    The Last Superstition: Software Is Immaterial

    Chapter 4: Minds Are Not Material In order to prove that human souls are immortal, Feser has to prove that there’s some part of a person that survives death, and the destruction of the body. If there’s a part of a human left behind when you remove the matter, that part must presumably be immaterial, […]

  • The Last Superstition: Animal Souls

    The Last Superstition: Animal Souls

    Chapter 4: Scholastic Aptitude Having introduced his main themes in chapters 1-3, Feser now elaborates upon them, starting with The Soul a soul is just the form or essence of a living thing. [p. 121] And the form or essence, you’ll recall, is the whatever-it-is that makes a thing the sort of thing that it […]

  • The Last Superstition: The First Cause

    The Last Superstition: The First Cause

    Chapter 3: The First Cause If you thought Feser’s “Unmoved mover” argument was just mental masturbation, the sort of sophistry that gives philosophy a bad reputation and evokes the image of a tweed-wearing ivory tower professor using five-dollar words to ask meaningless questions, then you can skip his First Cause section, because it’s more of […]

  • The Last Superstition: The Unmoved Mover

    The Last Superstition: The Unmoved Mover

    Chapter 3: The Existence of God: The Unmoved Mover First of all, “movement” in this context really means change of any kind, not necessarily motion through space. Yes, I know this is annoying and confusing. Feser introduces two kinds of causes: accidentally ordered and essentially ordered. (Here, “accidentally” doesn’t mean “by misfortune”, and “essentially” doesn’t […]

  • The Last Superstition: Who Is This God Person, Anyway?

    The Last Superstition: Who Is This God Person, Anyway?

    Chapter 3: The Existence of God So when people say “God”, what sort of entity are they talking about? Many secularists seem hell-bent (if you’ll pardon the expression) on pretending that religious people in general believe in a God so anthropomorphic that only a child or the most ignorant peasant could take the question of […]