Hovind Guilty


Well, that didn’t take long:

Jury deliberations took about three hours.

A federal jury has convicted Kent Hovind and his wife, Jo, of tax fraud.

The article doesn’t say whether they were found guilty on all charges, or what the sentence will be.

Also, at some point the PNJ started reporting that the Hovinds owed $845,000 in unpaid taxes, rather than the original $470,000. I don’t know what the deal is with that.

Update, 13:19: astute commenter DodgerDean provided a link to the booking photo, which I’ve added here.

Hovind Trial Whimpers Into the Final Stretch

I’ve been away for a few days, but imagine my surprise at reading this
in Wednesday’s Pensacola News Journal:

The prosecution has rested its case in the trial of Pensacola evangelist and tax protestor Kent Hovind and his wife, Jo.

The defense will not present a case.

And then today’s article:

Defense lawyers for Kent and Jo Hovind rested their case on Wednesday without presenting evidence or calling witnesses.

Read More

Hovind Trial Update

Two more stories in the Pensacola News Journal about Kent Hovind’s tax evasion trial:

Christian College leader says taxes are part of religion

Hovind argues God’s workers are exempt

and

Lawyer: Hovind detailed actions

Evangelist said he ‘beat the system’

Read More

Hovind Trial, Day 2

It’s day two of Kent Hovind’s trial for tax fraud, and still no
Mike Argento or
H.L. Mencken
has emerged to report live the unvarnished snark. Still, the trial’s being covered by the Pensacola News Journal. It’s not much of a media feeding frenzy, but I suppose the national outlets have juicier stories to cover closer to Dennis Hastert’s gravity well.

Read More

Jury Picked in Hovind Trial

The Pensacola News Journal (“Still the only paper covering the Hovind trial!”) reports that a jury has been picked to decide whether Kent Hovind is an impoverished minister or a huckster who owes the IRS nearly half a million bucks in back taxes.

I’d love to see the trial transcripts, but I haven’t found them anywhere.

Hovind Trial Begins

The Pensacola News Journal reports
that jury selection for Kent Hovind’s trial begins today. If a jury is selected quickly enough, there might also be time for both sides’ opening remarks. I won’t speculate on whether this is likely, though.

Hovind himself hasn’t written anything about this since
Sep. 27, when he wrote

As for the media, well, they just need a new piece of meat to grind up every day to sell their papers. Truth and the destruction of innocent lives mean nothing to them.

This explains why the only paper to have covered this trial so far is the Pensacola News Journal, which has only published a few local news briefs like the one above.

Sorry, Kent, but you’re no OJ Simpson. The only people who care about your trial are creationism wonks like me.

Gil Dodgen: Uncommonly Dense

Gil Dodgen posted the following over at Uncommon Descent:

All computational evolutionary algorithms artificially isolate the effects of random mutation on the underlying machinery: the CPU instruction set, operating system, and algorithmic processes responsible for the replication process.

If the blind-watchmaker thesis is correct for biological evolution, all of these artificial constraints must be eliminated. Every aspect of the simulation, both hardware and software, must be subject to random errors.

Of course, this would result in immediate disaster and the extinction of the CPU, OS, simulation program, and the programmer, who would never get funding for further realistic simulation experiments.

All I can say is “wow”. Either Dodgen is having us all on (which I doubt, since he’s started a new thread to respond to the charge that he doesn’t know WTF he’s talking about), or he honestly doesn’t understand the difference between the simulated environment and the machine doing the simulating.

Presumably he also believes that when NOAA simulates the effect of a hurricane hitting the Florida coast, they have to pour rain onto their computers. And that every time an orc dies in World of Warcraft, a real orc dies in some distant land.

I know that I’m often too rooted in the concrete and have trouble going from a collection of facts to a general principle, but damn!

Is ID Old, or New?

Over at Uncommon Descent,
Lee Bowman complains about people who say ID is a new movement:

Many cite Johnson as the founder of the current ID movement. Popularizer perhaps, but founder he was NOT, nor can he authoritatively be credited with setting its parameters. Luskin notes (as does Dembski in ‘Cosmic Pursuit’, 1998) that Charles Thaxton and Dean Kenyon first wrote on the subject during the ’80s. But is concept even that new?

Throughout the centuries theologians have argued that nature exhibits features which nature itself cannot explain, but which instead require an intelligence over and above nature. From Church fathers like Minucius Felix and Basil the Great (3rd and 4th centuries) to medieval scholastics like Moses Maimonides and Thomas Aquinas (12th and 13th centuries) to reformed thinkers like Thomas Reid and Charles Hodge (18th and 19th centuries), we find theologians making design arguments, arguing from the data of nature to an intelligence operating over and above nature.” (Wm. Dembski, ‘Cosmic Pursuit’, 1998)
http://www.arn.org/docs/dembski/wd_idmovement.htm

(bold face added.)

If ID has such an ancient heritage, then I think it’s fair to ask why there aren’t any experimental results demonstrating ID. Who are the Isaac Newtons and James Clerk Maxwells of ID? Why isn’t there broader consensus amongst ID proponents of the basics of ID, such as the number of designers, the times and places when they operated, or even a definition of “complexity”?

If, on the other hand, ID is scientific, but too young to have produced any good results, then why should it be taught in public schools?

D. James Kennedy godwinates; Behe distances himself from “Darwin’s Deadly Legacy

For those who didn’t know, Coral Ridge Ministries is producing a TV show to appear in a few days, called Darwin’s Deadly Legacy. Judging by the preview, it’s going to be one long argumentum ad Hitlerum, along with a heaping dose of evolution denial, and a bit of Columbine thrown in for good measure.

Read More

Fun Postponed

According to
Kent Hovind’s weblog,
the date for his trial (58 counts of tax evasion, for those who’d forgotten) has been postponed until Oct. 17, so we’ll have to wait an extra five weeks for him to start getting his comeuppance. Oh, well.